not a fan of the videos prefer to be able to read everything

Great course. Thank you!

I have a reading disability so LOVE the audio classes thanks you for having audio classes available

The website is great. You can move as quickly as you want, through the course.

The quality of writing is juvenile. I began to merely scan the text after the first page or so because the writing quality is so poor. Here's a gem that appears on the top of page seven: " Gonna provide you with another scenario under Title VII." The following sentence fragment from page 29 includes punctuation that suggest it was intended to be a fully functional sentence: "A lower valuation than the prior year after having made a complaint." This fragment contains neither a subject, nor a verb. The entire text is a mishmash of poorly conceived thoughts, trite idioms, and other tortured text. For comparison, I recently completed WebCE courses pertaining to the preparation of personal financial statements, the gig economy, and digital/virtual currencies. Each of those courses included thoughtfully prepared reading material. The poor quality of this course stands in stark contrast. Even some of the test questions are so absurd that reading the text is not necessary. In other cases, ill-advised idioms are embedded in the questions such as question 18 on the exam I received that included the tired phrase of "the straw that broke the camel's back." This class tarnishes other quality offerings from WebCE.

I appreciated the multiple examples used to define the different employment laws.

I have had this instructor before. She is really good at presenting.

Especially liked the use of videos to explain situations, and talk through subtle nuances of employment law and harassment.

The presenter of this video was excellent! Did not speak in such a monotone voice like all the other videos I have watched before.

The examples that the instructor used red, yellow, and green was too redundant. I recommend included different scenarios.

I really enjoyed the EEOC course. I learned a lot from the calm voice of the presenter, Christine Sensenig. Her examples assisted in my understanding.

This course was long in duration for the credits considering all of the verbal presentation. I could not locate the text to read it and move through it that way. I think I would have absorbed more by reading in combination with the verbal presentation. I did like the mock tests that pointed out where one did not understand the content.

the course had too many questions inta course.

The presenter on the video was excellent.

I didn't care for this class. The speaker did a good job, though. I thought the stoplight metaphor was interesting.

Seemed a little longer than 2 hours of content, especially when you include the practice questions?!

this was only for 2 credits but the class and the exam seemed like 4 hrs

good presenter

Information was clear and concise.

Thank you.

Wonderful presentation! Wonderful content! Highly recommend!

The instructor (video) was very good!

Challenging questions but very informative. I truly enjoyed the Information, and it was a great refresher.

The course I took were really good. Some of the grammar and spelling were questionable. The audio was nice, the extra readings and videos were a great break.

two questions did not have correct answers as options. all answers were incorrect. in my opinion. may want to review.

Instructor was outstanding!

Great Course

Didn't like the video.

I usually love your content and presentation. This course did not meet you usual standards in my opinion.

The only thing is the title starting "Hot Topics" but focusing on long standing employment laws that have not changed substantially in many years. I had hoped to have a segment that at least touched on more recent issues.

Well laid out and a nice sequence.

Well Pleased

The instructor did a great job covering the important topics in this course.

felt that the course was too long for only 2 CE credits. felt the same as for one I did for 3 CE credits.

I could not find the "read it to me" audio button. Please make these instructions clear.

The course was fine but several of the Exam questions had questionable/confusing wording. One example (I don't remember specific name or answers) was that Steven wanted to join the office football pool. When he asked to join, he was told the spots had all been chosen. This is an example of... I chose shunning but the other options were things like retaliation, harassment, and something else. I feel like this was not a good exam question because if it's a pool board and the spots are taken, then they're all taken- he should have asked to join sooner. Maybe not the best example but there were a couple questions that I felt none of the answers really applied that well.

Chapter 1 practice question 3 asks, "Which employee is least likely to be in a protected class". They are all in protected classes and are, thus, equally likely, that's the whole point. This question is problematic.

I really enjoyed the video content of this course

thank you

Brewer's online courses have got to be the best there is!

The CE was for 2 hours. It took 2.20 minutes to complete the course and the exam.

in over 30 years of completing insurance CE this course was the very best. the presenter was amazing. i wish all the courses were like this one

I enjoyed this course very much. It provided a lot of information I was not aware of.

Loved the video.

Please consider amending some of the questions as a few are poorly worded. All in all, good class

Please consider amending some of the questions as a few are poorly worded. All in all, good class

Pre-exam content was too lengthy for the amount of CE credits

Having a video presentation rather than just reading text is preferable.

I LOVE the lecturer's various Analysis Video presentations as she is quite thorough in explaining the 3 Red, Yellow & Green positions and make a final suggestion of what treatment is the best appropriate for the particular scenario in her example! These vivid videos make the topics very interesting and lively that I always want to see/hear more of what she will say next! But I do have a Constructive Comment to urge the Author to put all her sayings in her videos in writing at the very end of each Session so that we the Students can make referrals to when we answer the Quiz or Final exam questions. Thank you.

I liked the video presentations.

Informative content for the amount of course time.

Some of the questions and their answers were poorly worded.

Format of course materials and access to course overviews with the speaker

This was my favorite class and format so far!

I enjoyed the course, but found myself frustrated by the video/photography quality. This may seem petty, but the shiny nature of the presenters face made it look like she was sweating to death and I just wanted to reach into the screen and mop her face. This is really sad, because her presentation was wonderful!

Didn't like the traffic light examples

Excellent

I prefer to read so the video presentation isn't my favorite.

Had trouble with the mechanics of the video, it was not smooth. Wanting to go back and review was difficult. Excellent presenter

The information provided in the teaching videos is excellent as the instructor is an experience attorney! Thank you, however, this is very hard for just everyday insurance agents!

The information provided in the teaching videos is excellent as the instructor is an experience attorney! Thank you, however, this is very hard for just everyday insurance agents!

Good Course!

Thank you for recommending this course!

Loved the ease of studying the material and taking the exam.

I think there may be an issue with Practice question #4 for Chapter 8. It states the answer should be within 75 miles but when that option is chosen, it's incorrect. The system is showing the correct answer as "D" does not apply

I was expecting a more detailed examination of law - this course was more "light" and kept mostly to application in real-life scenarios. I recognize the importance of this fact, however I personally would have preferred a text based course with more details on the specific language of the laws themselves.

Excellent speaker! I really enjoyed this class.

Enjoyed having a video instructor for most of the course. She was engaging and very easy to follow. Excellent job.

Some of the questions were difficult and hard to answer correctly. The stem of the question didn't contain enough facts, or a clear fact pattern. Were some written by AI? Maybe less questions that cover relevant information?? I didn't sense that I was always being asked about the material - which is very important - but how well I could guess or pick the "best answer." Somewhat disappointing. Bob

This was by far my favorite class for CE. The presenter was amazing and kept me engaged throughout the entire class. She made the examples real world accurate I would definitely take more classes if Christine Sensenig, Esq was presenting and they were of this caliber.

The course was boring and seemed to be stretching to fill time.

Very informative

Excellent!

There is no clear audience for this course. Is it for HR employees? Supervisors? Business owners? The presenter frequently addresses a “Risk Manager” but she presents little actionable guidance, just the advice that every situation you encounter will be different and merits careful consideration. (This is so self-evident, it's not helpful to "learn" in a CE class.) The Red/Yellow/Green concept muddies every single scenario, occasionally causing the presenter to repeat herself or misspeak while talking around and around an issue. The content doesn’t dive into nuclear verdicts, only mentions EPLI in the glossary, barely mentions Directors & Officers coverage, and doesn’t broach the idea of how a professional in any field could help a client experiencing these kind of issues. I vote to send this one back to the whiteboarding stage — change the title to one of the presenter’s quotations: “It’s not a problem ’til it’s a problem” keeping the same general outline of legal points, but totally re-thinking the delivery/presentation, itself. Definitely not a win for an insurance license renewal course, but I can’t think it would be very helpful for internal Risk Managers, either.

This is the first video course I have seen from your site and really enjoyed the different delivery style!

This was one of the most biased trading I have ever taken. A small percentage of the answers given were proven by the laws, however this person's example were extremely prejudice. I will avoid this instructor for future courses. I do not want to be contacted after giving this evaluation....PERIOD.

Did not enjoy the Red / Yellow/ Green approach for the course

Christine Sensenig, Esquire is an excellent presenter. Her cadence was perfect for me. I appreciated the red, yellow, and green thought-provoking moments. It was also eye opening. Interesting cases and scenarios. I normally do not look forward to videos for my CE courses but I will look for hers!

I liked the videos in this course

This was the best course I have ever taken. Presenter was excellent.

More interesting and useful than I thought it would be.

Excellent course!!

the ease of studying and testing.

Enjoyed the all video format of this course. Speaker was very good and held my interest.

This was a great and informing course is to lean and use

I really enjoyed everything about the Web CE courses. My main concern is getting my hours recorded with the Department of Insurance as my requirements expire today at midnight. I didn't realize I needed more hours until I checked yesterday. I though I had carryover hours. Thank you so much!

The instructor in this video course was excellent and presented the material in a very effective way.

Easy to understand: it’s great

The red/yellow/green light presentation was a bit confusing, especially as the rules around it changed. Most problematic, the presenter kept talking about 'where you were probably coming from' but put too little focus into 'this is how you should consider it'

I enjoyed the video. It was a nice change from the robo-voiced courses.

Excellent presentation with insightful analysis of real-world scenarios.

One of the best presented and most interesting courses I have taken.

EXCELLENT PRESENTOR!!!!!!

I didn`t like these red/yellow/green. Please give me an answer if this is right or wrong and do not mislead me with suggestions of what I might be thinking.

Thank you!

Excellent course and content was well presented.

Have always liked web CE courses - did not like the videos in this one

Terrible. Again, some answers were not correct.

On your examples used, can you vary the types of people used? Everyone has to deal with unbiased opinions of others, not just white men and Christians. Change it up, it is getting tiring to hear the same examples over and over.

A rare miss for you - not a great class. The video case study discussions were too long given how obvious they were. There's got to be a better way to teach this material instead of that long-winded 'red, yellow, or green light' concept. The practice questions weren't all that connected to the video content. Also, there was a mistake on the test question on pregnancy discrimination. This was my first class with you I thought was not well taught, though the subject is interesting.

you are my favored CE provider!

Loved it

The audio was great, and the content interesting.

Practice questions and exam questions were poorly drafted and confusing.

The course was very informative. But, there were a few instances when you used 'he' or 'she', and you could have used a gender neutral word.

Fair credit hours per time required to complete the course.

Enjoyed seeing the instructor.

I did not like the video only format. Additionally, no option for closed captions, that would have been beneficial. The instructor was great, however.

Presenter kept the course informative and interesting without interjecting personal bits of her life.

The presenter was excellent and clear to understand. Appreciated the pace of her presentation.

excellent

Excellent course!

Audio video takes too long

See Final Exam #80-d. Needs to be rewritten to the actual correct answer based on the scenario requirement by her OB.

What I liked most was that it was a video. I did another class that was written and I used the audio and I did not like it.

Don't like having to take test twice with the practice ones and forced videos.

Not sure how this applies to the CFP

Loved the video presentation!!

Course was great!

I really wish more of your lessons had videos and instructors like this one. I really enjoyed the format and the instructor.

Great presentation!!

Thank you

Very hard to hear woman in video.

I found the sexual harassment section of the course to be poorly presented. It was too graphic and explicit in presentation. I also found the religious discrimination section to be prejudicial and legally inaccurate. Very disappointed.

Offer close caption for videos. I am a person protected under ADA and needed the CC option.

This is by far the best instructor. She is engaged and enthusiastic. Her lecture was interesting and she kept me focused to pay attention.

This course was very informative and easy to study. I learned a lot during that course.

Excellent Class

Excellent

I loved the instructor.

The instructor was excellent!

perfect

The host/narrator was the best I've ever listened to! Very informative and great explanations.

I really liked the repetitive and cohesive presentation using the stoplight illustration. I also appreciated how the instructor was able to encourage the student to think about the different perspectives involved in each scenario and to raise awareness for the thoughts and feelings of others.

Great Job...Thank you

I greatly appreciated the presentation. The attorney that was delivering the content was engaging and a great presenter. Great course.

I have used Web CE for several years and love the materials. This one failed to meet the standards I am used to. Video/audio is great when accompanied by written materials which accommodates different learning/absorption preferences. The focus of this training is incredibly critical to business leaders but the singular focus on a video with a court stenographer document was a failure.

This class on employment law was excellent. Best class, very clear, thought provoking

Presenter was fabulous.

excel;wnt

I loved the different red, yellow and green scenarios. Very thought provoking and interesting.

I generally prefer to read material rather than have it read to me.

I would let the chapter test show up as a pre-test exercise before the exam

Chapter objectives could be written and presenters dialogue used as supportive enhancement to course material.

The course and material was informative.

I love the Law and Ethics classes

The video for entire course was greatly appreciated!

Thank you!

Having a video presenter of the material was like being in a class situation. Thank you.

I loved the slide side piece, reviewed that first before the reading material, the video was good. Overall a really well received course.

I really spent 2 hours and 20 minutes including the test but only get 2 hours. Not right.

I learn better with written info and this had all videos which went against how I learn. If I was not an insurance veteran then I would have not passed this course very easily.

The videos were difficult to hear, it kept stopping and skipping.

'Excellent course.

Could not turn Autoplay OFF. Prefer reading text to audio presentation.

Several questions on during the course of the class that were absolutely subjective. There were several questions on the quizes and exams that were not in the content.

though the text addressed it, the speaker didn't discuss termination for cause when it comes to workers compensation. I would like to know more about scenarios about when can you terminate without fear of retaliation. Basically it sounds like anyone can file a retaliation claim and the only winners are lawyers.

Too many Quizzes throughout this course!

WebCE is/has been my "go to" source for all continuing education for many years and will continue to be.

Loved the Red, yellow, green light method. She did not devalue your point of view but gradually took you deeper. Very effective in retention of information as well as helping to calm our personal biases.

The audio-visual format is cumbersome for me. I prefer studying course material at my own pace>

I liked having a human reading the content rather than the monotonous male robot voice. The person in this video was really interesting

I found the videos to be very helpful and useful for learning the materials.

I did not use the video. The split screen format made it difficult to read and scroll. Would not take a course knowing that split screen would be there.

The questions on the quiz were challenging compared to the course questions.

This course did not come near meeting the quality of the other WebCE classes that I've taken. There were numerous typos, it's written in more a conversational mode than a teaching mode and really doesn't give any true teaching, just hypotheticals. Disappointed in this one.

Great, engaging presenter

Very well presented, good flow of information highlighting critical aspects and elements of the subject matter

I completed sixteen hours this weekend. The Employee Related Claims course was by far the best.

i prefer working with printed material instead of looking at a computer screen

this was the first video class that I took...liked it a lot. sort of like having the computer read to me, but seeing the instructor helped retain the content better.

Don't need video of person talking. Just the audio is better

the video/wall and test exam is not ideal. Please allow me to to review the material in its entirety and take the exam.

Great!!!

For a course titled "hot topics" I was expecting the focus to be on more current workplace issues and not an HR primer of long-standing employment laws.

The quality of this course is far below the standards usually encountered on WebCE. The content is largely rudimentary and insufficient for supervisory- and management-level personnel. It is antiquated in failing to address genuinely hot current topics such as those relating to gender identity and expression. It is utterly without citation. It is vague in how it addresses the concept of "hostile work environment," and I did not observe the phrase "quid pro quo" mentioned or defined at all. And in some respects it is likely wrong -- such as by indicating that a male of European descent does not (or cannot) fall into a protected class, which is very much a matter of legal controversy. It provides little in the way of actionable guidance, in contrast to similar training such as that provided by Connecticut's Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities. This course met its objectives only in the sense that it provided an overview of principal federal statutes (but failed to address the myriad state and local requirements that expand federal protections) and permitted the acquisition of continuing education credits in an expeditious manner. This course should be recalled and rewritten.

I loved the videos and that the speed could be changed to go faster. I sometimes get bored or distracted if the speed is slow.

The audio video was GREAT! I wish you offered more courses with the audio video.

Video presentations are not helpful. Simply provide reading material.

The Presenter in the Video was AMAZING!!!

Videos are slow. Can we speed up the speed of speech?

The instructor was very good at communicating the rationale behind each scenario.

I did not like the design of this course and the lack of ability to self guide.

Great course.

This was the first renewal I have taken that included video rather than just reading the material. It was a really good format.

Truly enjoyed "real life" examples that we all can relate to by working experience.

This took much longer than the amount of time suggested by credit given for taking the course. That was very disappointing.

The search capability was great. The chapter reference with the questions was great. Being able to go back and forth between test and material was great.

The one criticism, i have, regarding this course, is that i was not able to read more than a block of text at a time. The amount of text displayed with the read-along video was limited and hindering my ability to read ahead. This was the most time consuming class from WebCE to date.

The stop sign analogies were a bit much to wade through. Something more straight forward with this material would have made it less cumbersome.

I really liked the instructor.

This was much easier to understand the content with a real person reading.

This course is poorly written; to the point that, at times, it is very hard to follow. Someone needs to edit the course and address repetition of words like "necessarily". In some cases the word is used correctly, in other places it is not and causes confusion. Additionally, some punctuation so entire paragraphs are not one sentence would make it easier to follow. Lastly, I'm sure I know why I got 1 question incorrect on the exam. However, the question about sexual harassment where we are supposed to based our answer only on the facts provided should be "no" it is not sexual harassment. It wasn't a good idea for a married man to ask a single woman to dinner to get to know her better, but that in itself is not harassment. Based on the facts, I don't know how someone could say otherwise. In order to choose "maybe" we would have to have more facts and we were supposed to use only the facts provided. That's frustrating to me. But, as someone with an English degree, the poor writing of the course was the most frustrating to me. --Thank you

I did not like the presentation of the material at all. The whole red light, yellow light, green light was very confusing as there was never really any correct answer. Many of the cases needed more information to make an informed answer.

The video learning format makes this course the best I've taken with you. It is a nice complement to the text and makes learning more enjoyable.

Did not like the scenario-exclusive format.

The video/audio was a big help.

The instructor was excellent! I enjoyed the video format!!!

great subjects and low cost

There is a quiz question where a Supervisor changes a decision after sleeping with their Administrative Assistant. This is clearly Sexual Harrassment because of the Superior/Subordinate relationship, however the quiz answer is Probably. The question needs to be rewritten as the fact that a direct supervisor makes an adverse action is ALWAYS by definition Harrassment.

I liked how the presenter addressed each of the 'red/yellow/green' responses and explained why most of the time, any answer could apply depending on the situation you find yourself in.

Great course! Easy to navigate and to take the exam as well!

I disliked the fact that the materials appeared to be a transcript of an informal speech.

Great course!

I would appreciate more content with video as I have dyslexia and ADD

Christine was awesome!

I really enjoyed this class, to date this is the most enjoyable CE class I have taken.

This course on Title VII was great. It took a complex topic and brought it to level of instruction that was easy to digest. This was easily the best Title VII course that I have ever taken. Thank you!

I've been a customer for many years now and just wanted to thank you. After 30 yrs in insurance, I always manage to learn something and can complete my licensing requirements in a reasonable timeframe.

In the video presentation, I don't recall the presenter ever defining what or who a "risk manager" is and what department they represent as it relates to the employees.

Thank you. Rod

It's great to have the option of working at whatever speed works for me.

The proctor made one mistake. She referred to a CT scan as "treatment." This is not correct. Radiology images are diagnostic not treatment. Medication, injection, prescribed drugs, cleaning a wound, wrapping a wound, PT, OT and others would be treatment. Otherwise, VERY WELL DONE!!!

Don't like the talk-to-me format and really, the Red/Yellow/Green belabored the points unbearably.

Study guide of some sort would be helpful for the exams

I very much liked this presentation with the lawyer reviewing each topic and showing all sides.

I really liked contrasting various points of view (red/yellow/green) and the explanations which followed.

The instructor was great!

Video and read along is a great aid!

Some material toughed on was not part of questions to retain the information. I prefer the studying all of the material at my pace and take the final exam. This is my first time using this format. However, I hope that the larger chapter/session that I am able to retain and apply what I learned.

excellent CE, this is the 2nd time I have used this for my CE

This was audio, but I felt like I needed to go back and rehear or read about one of the back pages, but I couldn't go back to reread them or hear them again.

I really enjoyed listening to the videos of the subject matter, from an expert in the field. Very educational and interesting.

good course

I liked that the course specifically addressed how Risk Management and Human Resources might interact and handle a scenario.

This was the worst course I have ever taken with you company. The education info presented was appallingly flawed and lead to a very offensive and problematic practice question in one of the modules. The actual question presented was "With respect to Title VII, which of the following employees of the Walls Company, located in Indianapolis, is least likely to be in a protected class? A. Aaron Golstein, a single rising executive of Jewish heritage B. Aisha Jones, and assistant vice president whose parents' immigrated to the United States from Africa C. Bruce Spring, who was born in the United States to parents of Dutuch, Irish and Italian ancestry D. Earnestine Fitzgerald, a married executive secretary with a slight English Accent. The correct answer provided and its rational was the following: C. Bruce Spring, a white male who was born in the United States, does not fall into a protected class. This is absolutely appalling. 1. The question is asking the test taker to engage in racial profiling 2. The law protects race and gender from being used as valid category to which discrimination can be applied. The law doesn't protect certain subcategories of races or genders and not protect other subcategories. This is appalling and leads the education to imply that is perfectly legal to discriminate against white males or that white males are not protected by the law in the same way that any other race of gender is protected.

excellent!

GREAT MATERIAL

I have nothing else to add.

All content and examinations are clear, concise, and intuitive.

No further comments.

Course was good overview and review.

Always a great class!!!!!

course was very easy

Thank you

thank you, I don't think trick questions are needed and seem forced.

In generally is great for those material.

I really like the read to me audio as well as the video slides. It definitely reduced the time and took some of the pressure.

easy to use and understand

Great video content

It was fine

Great material and cases

no changes needed

Great Platform

no extra comments

Nothing to add at this time.

Thank you