easy to follow

I would not be ordering again only because my employer ordered the course.

The Legal term s were confusing

Felt this course should have been more credit hours!

This was a tough one!

questions did not provide reality type circumstances and were time consuming to read for the education received.

I like how the test questions are also geared at "teaching" or reviewing information.

Good course

Very hard tesl

Web CE makes completing the continuing ED credits on my own time less stressful

Thank you

Someone should listen to the audio before putting it out there.

This was one of the most interesting classes because it brought in many facts about contracts. I enjoyed it very much.

Thank you

Overall the program was great. I spend more time with individual clients and I was hoping to see a little more regarding how this might related to financial planning. How much insurance is enough, and more specific to what client may ask. But the overall program was good!

Some of the questions are set up to confuse you when its not necessary.

It was a longer than I thought it would be and took me a long time to listen to each section. I appreciated the test questions and found them to be helpful. However, the 50 questions at the end were somewhat stressful regarding the wording. I am grateful for my passing score.

This presentation was NOT proof read at all. no one listed to the AI reader either - it misread so many word that it was distracting. Very poorly put together. not ready for prime time! disappointing. if this had been my first course, I would be done with WebCE

great information

Very easy to access courses on site!

confusing

This course is irrelevant to 99.99% of people involved in the insurance business, Latin phrases and issues that will be handed to legal counsel have nothing to do with our daily work.

Loved it. easy to use. and love the voice ready fixture.

I appreciated all of the examples given throughout the course, this helped to put the information into real-life context.

Navigating through the course material was not complex. the course also provided audio features that was very clear and also had pictures.

Appreciated the 24 unit package to complete all units required

difficult to interpret some sections with all the legal terms as they appeared to conflict

audible presentation is poor due artificially generated voice software. Presentation is rushed, prone to mispronunciation and unnatural inflection making presentation confusing. I disabled audio and simply read material

There were a few things on the exam which were not specifically mentioned in study material.

The last part of the course was very long winded.

The way the questions are made, are extremely difficult to follow sometimes

I thought course was well presented and worthwhile. Some of the legal terms are not relevant in the real insurance world.

Great course, looking forward to learning more from your bank of courses.

This was a difficult course.

Clear and precise instruction. Thank you.

so much great information

Thank You

Way to many questions on renters policie

excellent overall nd user friendly

Thanks!

In section "Pre-Loss Policy Analysis", section "Read the Exclusion Carefully, and Watch for Exceptions" there is paragraph "Property Not Covered". The last sentence describes other property not covered by a homeowners policy and reads "Other items include property of roomers and boarders, business data, and water or steam." I assume the water or steam implies that the HO policy does not provide boiler coverage, however the HO policy would cover a burst pipe from a heating system using water or steam and the resulting water damage. So the way you phrase the sentence is ambiguous.

Parts of this course would have been better suited for contract law students. There also seems to be a bias against one insurance company, that was mentioned at least three times in the materials.

The speaker mispronounced words.

Have faith in the honesty of licensed adjusters

this is insane. no other words needed.

The author(s) presentation, written and example were all commendable. I will probably read my homeowner policy and earthquake endorsement for the first time, thanks to the enlightenment.

Great course. It was an very good refresher!

The audio reading is clearly automated - tone and inflection make it almost impossible to follow. I chose to read instead.

The reading of content by AI is painful. Material should be read by an actual human who understands language pronunciation and basic grammar.

Great course, I learned a lot - maybe too much detail.

Course was informative and I felt extremely prepared for the exam!

i liked the key points always helpful .i thought being able to review practice questions was a good way to learn .

This course was a little hard to understand and grasp easily.

I really enjoyed some of the puns in the questions.

Please have a human read (especially Latin!)

Another excellent class, Thanks!

have used your site several times for my license renewal. I have recommended your product to several people.

the who course keeps you on track and explains it all

i would change the answer color if you get a question incorrect... the color of the correct answer the green is difficult to see and i would explain why the correct answer is correct instead of just putting it in a different color. highlighting it in yellow would enable the correct answer to be seen clearly

The audio AI needs to be examined for more proficient in reading the material, as "read" and "read" was pronounced incorrectly, as was "present" and "present," as well as a number of other things.

Liked glossary. Interesting terms.

Interactive activities beyond the quiz at the end of each chapter.

I have used Web CE because if the quality of the writing of the content. This year, the courses I have taken have NOT been of the quality I experienced, and learned from, in the past. This course was particularily ambiguous and difficult to get any meaningful information. I am shocked I passed with a 96%. Please look at the editing of your courses. Thank you

Great Program -Mark

I thought this was a harder test based on all the things it covered but the questions did relate to the course.

Course covered too much material. It should be broken up into two courses

I am new to the insurance world and some documentation was a little technical for me. I appreciated it so much when you had examples. That really help clarify and give practical use examples that made a big difference.

Y'all keep up the great work...

I do not think it repaired me enough for the test.

Very user friendly. Thank you for making it easy to navigate the course. Great website. Thank you!!

It is best to take the course without the audio on. The narrator speaks fast in a very robotic manner which makes the material difficult to understand.

The proctor's instructions were challenging to understand.

it was hard but good info

Informative and easy to understand

some of the questions were ambigous

The material was presented well and concise. I enjoyed the open book factor which helped clarify things that I might have misheard/misread prior to testing.

Get someone to read it - the automated voice is distracting.

The mere fact that this course exists, begs the question of whether insurance is comprehensible to the majority of the public. Since we all require it, it should be reformed. A literate person (not reasonable) should be able to read an insurance contract.

This course, I found to be overly complicated. I haven't run into scenarios like the examples given but it was an eye opener if I ever do.

I process info best by reading the material, so i love that i do not have to use the audio/video aspects. however, i appreciate the fact that they are there for others who do use them.

You impress me as always! (Some case studies required more data. For instance, "The Carlson3 case." Should have stated that the insureds son, did NOT live with his parents, or the claim would have been covered. I caught a couple errors/omissions, in the examples, but its easy to do in this situation. Thank YOU! & Happy Holidays~Chrissy Metz

Again, the questions are so wordy they tend to lose all meaning. Please must make the test knowledge based.

Several of the questions were unrelated to the content of the course.

Liked test questions at the end of each section

I thought that the material was very educational, but I found some of the test (and practice test) questions to be ambiguous. Thank you.

I am not studying for, nor am I taking the Texas exam... This CE course should not have been this difficult! In short, this CE material sucks

Great training course!

I preferred the courses with test after each section and did not like the 50 question courses.

Really like the "Key Points" in each chapter.

I enjoyed this class learned quite a bit and I love the audio

No comment

While the court cases are relevant, they can be a bit overwhelming to a lay person.

course felt like it was for an attorney. Too many legal Latin terms.

I have used web ce for many years. The information presented this year was confusing and unnecessary. Questions were too long and complicated. For example,why am I learning Latin terminology? I probably will not use WebCE again. Disappointing.

doing fine at this point

I like the audio, however, having a robot-person read it makes it difficult to follow along. It also makes mistakes when reading, such as when there is a typo or an abbreviation.

Too much content was difficult to understand. Had to read multiple times to understand. It was too wordy and used too mush legal jargon that the general public does not understand. Like: what is an Estoppel?! Many of the questions were confusing and way too long. Some of them didn't seem to have any answers that were in the content. They were worded as a "Trick" questions and seemed like they were deliberately over difficult.

Having taken other courses from your website, it was not clear that this format was different up front. The fact that this was a final test with pre-tests versus testing on each chapter was not apparent until I was actually into the course itself.