I have been doing my CE courses and licensing courses through you guys for years, and this was one of the most interesting courses that I have taken!

The format of the course and ease of use of the website were great.

Best author! Can tell author is genuinely passionate about the subject covered. A bit too many examples timewise in the ethics area for someone who actually tries to read every point in a 4 credit course. Still- excellent and glad I took this.

It does not take anywhere near 4 hours to complete this course.

Everything is great. Keep it all the same.

some of the answer bubbles on this survey are different sizes. It's distracting.

ALl was great

The questions in the quizzes were very vague.

The structure of this course was difficult to follow.

amazing

Easy to understand and very relevant material

There was one complaint. Your example for a question #19 on Norman's botched attempt for suicide was unnecessary and incentive and distasteful. There are many ways to provide question for multiple choice answer. This was not funny.

I felt as though so of the cases included weren't clear. I wasn't sure what grounds some of the claims were denied upon. In the case of the house that burn down & the ex was trying to get the insurance money was the house rebuild with the claim money or did she become owner of a burnt down house & lot? Other case studies I didn't understand as they were too brief.

Easy and informative!

Great continuing education process.

Remove all gendered pronouns used in the training material. The gender of a person described in the training material is of no concern to the material. Using they/them will allow all material to be viewed with less bias and factual representation of the material.

This one was a bit more challenging material, but the test was easy. I'm glad I took the course.

The GUI is not consistent from course to course. some of the exam questions do not have the correct answers, and you have no way to tab from searched term to term. I'll finish the package of courses i have bought for this round, but will be shopping for a new vendor the next time i need CE. Your product has the smell of slapdash.

Only recommendation would be for the audio not to have a monotone voice.

It was kind of scary a lot of legalizes but I learned from it and that is my intentions.

Other than a few spelling and grammatical errors, the course was very good.

Course content good however, vocabulary is VERY FORMAL & difficult to follow after a short time. The wording should remain simple and effective for studying.

Almost seemed like an ethics class.

excellent course

Wonderful service!!!

The content is very easy to Navigate.

I scored 100%, so that should tell you how satisfied I was with this training.

Another great lesson, thank you.

I liked the format of some sample test questions then the actual large test. Not a lot of sections as some I see have way too many and too lengthy for the amounts of credit it gives. Would be nice to know how many sections and tests there are before selecting one.

Thank you for the extra study tips...to go back and look at the chapter before answering

The inclusion of Canada’s code of ethics for adjusters was totally irrelevant and the constant reference to California insurance codes and laws was also irritating.

Thank you very much!

Good course a bit long

The author of this course needs to be a little less complex and relatable.

Another great course! Many Thanks!

Boring!!!

Photos and videos would be great to make the course more interesting instead of just text.

The read it to me audio was a great idea. It was not available 2 years ago. It keeps you focus and help you keep concentrated. Brilliant. This is the 3rd time I work with these courses. For me the best. You give us the time we need. Thank you very much.

It is too long

The course and exam questions confused factual and normative claims. I hope that an insurer's high moral and ethical standards are likely to result in success, but was any evidence cited to substantiate the claim? My question #34 used an example that one party failed to trust another party, but assumed that that the lack of trust was due to failure to have an open mind rather than legitimate reasons for distrust. The question doesn't state that reasons for distrust were lacking but assumes that they must have been.

I like the fact you did test quizzes before the actual final exam.

Thank you!

More interactive

Easy website and clear material content

Interesting prospective on ethics and best practices.

course content was good and enjoyed the audio which helped.