Good value and topics updated for current tax law OBBB
Ordering form again!
Excellent teaching and practice materials
Good course. thanks!
I am glade I was able to complete my CE requirement on my computer. Mainly the knowledge base ambeded in the material is priceless! Thank you.
I have been using Web CE for 10 years. I think the program is very good. It has a variety of topics that are needed. I will continue using them for as long as I need to do continuing education
Already recommended to many of my friends
The monotone voice is hard to listen to after awhile. Overall I enjoy WebCE courses!
I like the fact that the WebCe courses can be completed at the student's own pace. No need to rush through them because of time limit deadlines.
I like the use of the word "prorated" when describing percentage of use.
I received an "access denied" message trying to print the course materials in a PDF File and had to use the secondary option of printing them to a browser window. Also, I believe the answer to Question 1 (Hyde Park Corporation) may be wrong. Because it was a corporation and the straight-line depreciation method was used, it was forced to account for 20% of the $30,000 depreciation ($6000) as ordinary income. . So of the $135K gain, it should have been a $6000 of ordinary income and $129,000 of sec. 1231 gain. ...I think.
satisfied
Thanks!
The course is very good in giving the details and explanation of the form 2848, POA. This couse made form 2848 easy to understand.
The information was basic. Was hoping for more in-depth information.
Some of the practice questions and exam questions did not provide enough detail to confirm an answer. Often had to make assumptions to select an answer. Also, the chapter descriptions were not helpful for going back and trying to review a specific topic. It was easier to search the IRS website and tax return forms to clarify my understanding of a topic to be able to answer practice questions rather than review the course materials that were sometimes oddly organized and difficult to reference.
The course give out alot of examples that help the learners to understand easily.
Great course!
Great investment of my time.
Well written course!
A little more explanation on some of the examples
Good course
Would like more on out-of-pocket expenses for charities, less on donated property. Otherwise, it was fine.
This course in particular the practice questions seemed a bit misleading and lead to one having to make assumptions.
easy to follow course
Course was well presented
One of your sample answers is incorrect. You ignopred a negative for a positive.
understandable language and great examples
Would like to be able to print the practice questions for later reference.
This course helped me understand the subject material.
The course was very informative and increase my knowledge on the subject.
Don't like the AI robo-voice droning. I turned it off.
I love the WebCE courses!
Make a clear and direct approach on explaining the rules and examples.
As a CFP, I would really like to see a CE course on using residential real estate in financial planning. This course was more intended for accountants.
Need many more specific depreciation example scenarios.
I feel the time could be a little more.
the audio could be a little less monotoned
As someone who is also a real estate agent, that was easy for me.
like ease of course
Content was relevant and complete. All the material needed to answer the questions was provided. Efficient and easy delivery.
I feel this course was at a far higher level than my position requires, or is allowed to use. I cannot give tax advice, nor is it in my field. I felt largely overwhelmed by the course.
Overall, I am pleased with this course. If any change would be made, I would add that the writing could be a bit more conversational. Some of the reading did make me feel as though I was reading directly from Circular 230.
I really like the ease of the course and open book accessibility.
videos would be very helpful on this course.
Excellent course
I referred another CPA to WebCE today.
Keep on with the good job.
I really like your courses and how they are presented and the use of back and forth to review the content. However, the narrator, which I am guessing to be an AI, has a problem with pronunciation of acronyms and some words. Maybe it is just me, but I find this very distracting and find myself going back to reread the previous paragraph often to make sure I understand what was meant . You might want to listen to the 1031 exchange portion of this course to get an idea of what I am talking about.
Rey nice
This course explained "boot" well. I found that to be a very confusing topic when I was originally studying for the EA exam (12 years ago.)
Learn something new every time! Thank you
So much tax detail for so little testing!
Thank you
Good job
This was one of the best classes I've taken on this subject. Everything was explained thoroughly and I learned a few new things besides.
I found this course complex but worth doing, especially how to calculate ordinary gain versus long term gain.
A lot of material - could be condensed.
enjoyed the course...
excellent course.
excellent course
The course content, seemed to me, to have too much repetition in the wording of things so I was very confused.
This course was much more technical and difficult than other 2 unit courses.
My question 10 had a typo year 2027 vs 2024.
Some of the numbers in example formulas were wrong. The numbers in the written answer were correct.
Well constructed course.
The man reading the material was monotonous and pronounced many words incorrectly. This was very distracting.
I have used WebCE for several years.
We will appreciate if there's a PDF of the material in the beginning of each course.
Thanks for the audio and the ability to study at my own pace.
WebCE makes the courses relevant, convenient and affordable. I couldn't be more pleased.
This was a very good course. It educated me on the topics very well and I learned alot.
The course was very informative and it was presented effectively.
Software is user friendly.
SECOND GUESS MYSELF SO MUCH ON THE TEST. THIS TIME IT PAID OFF.
Ease of use. Clearly defined subject matter.
Excellent
The example of Roth phaseout contribution uses an incorrect equation. Looks like it was not updated from a previous tax year.
Some of the descriptive sections about deductions and expenses felt repetitive and could have used tighter editing.
ONCE AGAIN THE COURSE MATERIAL IMPLIES THAT BOTH CPAs AND ATTORNEYS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENROLLED AGENTS. THAT NEEDS TO STOP!! THE LIST OF PROFESSIONALS WITH UNLIMITED PRACTICE RIGHTS IS ALWAYS PRESENTED WITH EITHER ATTORNEY OR CPA FIRST. THERE IS NO SUCH REQUIREMENT TO ALWAYS LIST THEM IN THAT ORDER. THIS PRACTICE SHOULD STOP. SIMILARLY, NUMEROUS NEWS ARTICLES OFTEN LOOSELY USE THE TERM "BE SURE TO CONSULT YOUR CPA ..." OR "YOU SHOULD CHECK WITH YOUR CPA ...". THIS CONTINUED PRACTICE SERVES TO DIMINISH THE IMPORTANCE, RELEVANCE, AND COMPETENCE OF ENROLLED AGENTS. I LOOK FORWARD TO WEBCE MAKING AN EFFORT TO CHANGE THE WORDING IN COURSE MATERIALS ACCORDINGLY. THE NAEA NEEDS TO EMBARK ON A ROBUST MARKETING CAMPAIGN TO COMBAT THIS MISCONCEPTION IN THE PUBLIC ARENA. ALTHOUGH A BACHELORS DEGREE IS NOT A REQUIREMENT TO SIT FOR THE ENROLLED AGENT EXAMS, MANY ENROLLED AGENTS DO HAVE BACHELORS AND MASTERS DEGREES AND IN MANY CASES ARE MORE EDUCATED AND KNOWLEDGABLE THAN SOME CPAs AND ATTORNEYS.
Felt like the examples on page 34 were confusing and question there accuracy
Dont like computer audio. Better than nothing would prefer a real person.
The AI generated voice is not good quality. hard to listen to. i turned it off.
WebCE is very Professional and Friendly.
very helpful, I would recommend to a friend and I will use again
I enjoyed your class.
Very thorough
keep up the good work
Iwill recommend this course
QUALITY
Please slow the speaker's voice down.
Very informative.
Great Job!
I think you could be clearer with explainition of Simplified Method of Business Use of Home
Always like your products for reasons above
Very thorough content
Informative
Appreciate option to listen or not to listen to the presentation read aloud.
The last question on the final exam had an error in it - it was asking about contributions in 2027 while none of the material covered future years.
One of the answers on the test for the standard mileage rate was not correct.
One of the test questions had a date of 2027 and therefore led to making an incorrect answer. Please fix the question. Thank you.
good class
Well explained session