I wish there was more interactive objectives to engage learning throughout the read it to me audios.

1.It often talked about ACA related items in the context that "these JUST came out" As that was 12+ years ago, it made me wonder if the course was a little dated. 2. THe PA LTC section was only the PA code. I couldn't answer any of the study guide questions.

It was a great learning experience. However, there are a few pages that are reading 2025 data instead of the 2026 data that was on the pages.

Overall, great course! The only thing I'd probably recommend is putting the taxation info in the specific chapter instead of it having its own. It felt harder trying to go back and remember what type of coverage was being discussed, so I feel like it would be better to keep the taxation in the specific coverages' chapter.

Some of the correct answers in the practice exam were not an available answer choice in the final exam - such as the grace period. The practice exam specified 30 days for a grace period and the final exam specified 31. There should be more interactive material as well to help grasp the concepts. I found that long blocks of text were not ideal when trying to understand complicated policy information.

it seemed there were quustions on the exam not covered in the course

The last lesson on state LTC was just a repeat of the other lesson and did not have state-specific information that was expected.

would be beneficial to see the questions I got wrong on the exam to review and study further

It was just a lot without variation. Nothing to keep me interested and make learning flow

Once I clicked on a lesson, it automatically marked it at complete. I wanted to plan my future days out, but couldn't check how long a lesson was without it marking complete. Also, 4 questions per lesson didn't appear correct. A lesson that took 45 minutes got 4 practice questions and a lesson that took 4 minutes got 4 practice questions (often duplicate questions too). Would like a "study bank" so I could go back and confirm my understanding with additional questions to see where I need to revisit.

At first I wasn't sure that I still had to satisfy the time requirement for Life and Health since the updated requirement in California.

The revers way of setting questions integers with learning and focusing learning. The double negative trues to trick the exams taker rather than MAKING IT PERFECTLY CLEAR STATEMENTS ARE CLEARLY FALSE AND CLEARLY TRUE

The course content is comprehensive and well-aligned with the exam requirements. I particularly appreciated the detailed coverage of Medicare/Medicaid and tax-qualified plans. As a non-native English speaker, I would benefit from audio narration or visual summaries for complex concepts. Overall, solid preparation material.

I cannot remember, but one of the last sections did not match up with the auto reading.

Overall, course provided very good explanations on content. I'm not a big fan of exams that throw in a lot of exceptions that make the questions more about reading the Q correctly instead of testing exam material. Still, decent course, nicely laid out..

This course needs optimized for mobile devices.

It would be good to see correct answers while doing the practice exams so you learn what you're missing or that you're on the right track.

I mostly liked how I could customize practice exams. Some of the study guide sections could use more room for notes (ie, additional pages for the state-specific materials / topics).

Some of the questions were asked in a manner that could really confuse the reader. There were quit a few questions that took more thought to understand the question than answer the material.

Make it more smart phone user friendly.

the questions asked in the practice test were repeated to a point that I learned the answer by the question and not the material. Some of the questions were awful and seemed like a bad AI wrote it with no QA (like a "friend group of quilters" applying for group health - not eligible because they are not an association, but the "correct" answer was based on group). Many examples. Once I took the test the question format on the test was nothing like the practice tests in the program. There were several things asked in the real test that the practice tests never covered. WebCE encouraged me to push to learn to take the test so I could get out of it.

It might be nice to include more instructional video and with diagrams and varied illustrations. It would break the monotony of just reading the material. Perhaps watching animation and or diagrams could be optional. Thanks.

the course material was all over the place. Terminology that was not discussed was used in chapters not discussing it. The reading was way too fast even at its slowest setting. The chapters began with a summary that was complex and confusing, raising many unanswered questions only to have the material discussed from basic to hardest afterwards... that should be backwards, do a quick overview, teach from basic to hardest, and finalize with a summary that is comprehensive. the order of the chapters were not congruent most of the time. I am able to read legal lingo easily in contracts as i have higher education. Yet this course was very frustrating as it did not make sense most of the time.

I did not feel like some of the questions on the exam were fair with education given in lesson.

I thought the quizes between chapters were very helpful. I also enjoyed the Practice exams however, I took over 20 practice exams and there were many questions that were repeated over and over. I think it would be more beneficial to candiates if there were more variety of questions even it means just switching, numbers, names, etc.

The audio was not updated to 2026. It would reference 2025 information (example- Contribution limits). A few of the chapters had audio that did not match the text, one chapter seemed to have the correct audio, but the incorrect text.

Las explicaciones

different questions on the final exam

Since there's so many chapters, I would recommend allowing at least 6 months to complete the course as most adults are so busy to spend a lot of time retaining the information.

garbage course. practice questions were duplicates and out dated. videos were dry

The videos at the end of each section were very helpful to provide context and real word applications and examples.

Thank you WebCE for this experience in studying and getting my certificate.

I haven't been in school for about 7 years and coming onto this program allowed for easy note taking, its very structured and the information was very useful, I enjoyed the "for your review" sections and the ending summary video. nothing much to improve, having the pretest option was incredibly useful.

I wish I would have had the ability to review the questions I missed on the practice exam.

I had an excellent experience on the Life/Health/Accident production course. However in the future separation of the subjects would be nice, broken up by a 20 question review test. Thank you so much!

This course was very helpful and informative.

Some of the wording was written very oddly, but I presume this has to do with the nature of compliance based language.

was able to navigate pretty easily and complete the testing provided

I felt the practice test questions were way easier than the content covered on the actual course test

It should be allowed to review all of the exam questions to continue learning objectives. This exam was not similar to the practice exams

It should be allowed to review exam questions to continue learning objectives

It would be beneficial to have more than 90-days with this content.

The course was good, it provided the required/necessary information. It was a bit bland/boring. Perhaps more interactive videos or end of section tests before moving on to another category within the training. i.e. Health Insurance exam, Life insurance exam etc

The way some of the questions were worded was confusing. The definitions on the flashcards would be a lot more helpful if they were an actual definition or more explanatory. Some of the definitions had the terms in the sentence provided.

There were some grammatical errors in the course I took from WebCE.

Some of the wording in the mini quiz after each chapter was confusing. Overall, everything was helpful in completing the required excercises.

It's surprising that you are preparing me for the roll out of the ACA program, which is in the process of being defunded 10 years later while I am preparing to take this exam.

I disliked the fact that I had to take the test over 4 times because I was SO CLOSE TO passing. Couldn't figure out what I kept getting wrong that I could not pass the first couple times being just 1 or two points off from70 %.

I really liked the course the information was thorough.

me gusto la enseñanza y lo mucho que pude aprender

I liked the live videos

I like the course, it helps me prepare for the exam.

There were a few things it took me a while to figure out. LIke, while reviewing exams I got wrong, it took me a while to figure out that you highlighted the right answers in a slightly bolded green font. This should be MUCH more conspicuous!

a little more organized. but overall I enjoyed it and was easy to navigate

The only area of improvement I would like to mention is to this question: How effective did you find the presentation and format of the course material? I scored it at 3 because I found that the course questions were much easier than that on the final exam. Other than that, I am very satisfied with the course. Thank you.

Me gustó mucho la explicación ; se me hizo más fácil enteder

Some of the questions were worded in a way that could be easily confusing

Please provide more options for practice test and better answer analysis. SO reading heavy and no application.

Me parecio excelente y muy claro con su contenido

I liked the visual aids such as the charts, the conclusion video lectures and summaries of the chapter coming from the instructor; those were on key. I like the organization of each of the subjects studied and the order it followed. What I didn't like was something probably everybody else dislikes and that is the length of the course; 89 chapters is a bit steep; I noticed some of those chapters were repetitive at times and maybe we could condense it down a couple of chapters; I understand Insurance is a complex subject because it changes on an everyday basis, but it's still a lot of chapters. That's why I had to purchase more time with my course because I have a busy lifestyle, it's a lot of chapters and subject matter. On the other side of the token, I'm glad that these programs exist and I can complete these courses in the comfort of my own home at any available time I might have left during a busy day. Thank You so much.

I truly enjoyed the unlimited times to retake the pratice and simulated exams. Great way to learn on top of the modules. I really enjoyed that the sections can be broken down per exam or at least customizable. Allow to take smallers exams and build up to the big exam.

It would be great to have a course textbook for the course and be able to highlight and underline some important, key points to it.

Too many questions use a 'typical' number or example, but in-play it can be very much policy dependent. Additionally, the videos were a fantastic source and would have enjoyed seeing Midwest-Man at the end of each chapter.

The course was very helpful and informal.

Thank you for such an informative, useful course. The material was concise and not too wordy. Great learning, I will definitely be able to use and apply what I learned!!

I liked how it read the readings to me

Some of the questions were worded a little confusing.

The AI voice recordings mispronounced many terms/words, making it hard to follow some sections. There were also a couple of times written words seemed to be missing from content.

WebCe reinforcement videos are annoying because you can't advance them.

The information for the course was good, but it wasn't exactly easy to navigate some areas and some of the information seemed to be fragmented and not clearly stated under one subsection.

I believe that a three-hour-long exam is too much for the brain to maintain focus.

We could not see the videos on our work computer. The reading was great and helped me understand better.

ability to search for keywords was extremely difficult, you had to scroll the complete course to find results instead of jumping to them, the read-to-me was very monotone and hard to retain

I liked how the course was divided up into many chapters that were abled to be completed in reasonable time.

Some kind of better overview of the course. The flash cards are great for showing me things I need to learn but if I would have taken the time to look at the chapter and title layout I would have recognized how life & health insurance similarities and differences. This would have helped me retain the information easier. There is a study plan but I was so busy with limited time to study that retaining the information was my biggest issue.

thanks for making this user friendly

Good course for the cost!

Excellent and easy to follow layout. Please bring in a proofreader. The typos and missing letters/words are a huge distraction.

Does WebCe provide additional practice questions prior to taking the official exam at the testing center.

i would like to have availability to the exam for more practice even after passing it. i would like to feel more exam ready .

it would be great if AI would be added to this course to help me focus and further explain the concepts that i seem to have an issue comprehending.

Finished the course in 20 hours and had no idea how to kill 20 other hours, it seemed like study material did not apply to time allotment and that should be fixed.

I still need to test more, please provide me with extended course time period to continue to study for State Exam.

The final exam had many questions that were NOT covered on the practice exams. This is disappointing.

very easy to follow

It is confusing when state and federal rules conflict and makes it hard to answer questions on the exam. I'm not sure it the true Exam tests for contradictory rules, and if they don't those should not be presented in your exam. I guess i'll find out.

Questions on test were long and hard to comprehend. Terms used in test were different than course material. Ex - instead of using the term Exclusion Rider the test used a term I have never even heard before (impairment rider) and it confused my comprehension. Test took over 3 hours to finish because it was so long and the questions were hard to make sense of. There are also way too many "Gotcha" questions. By this I mean a question that has 2 similar answers but one is worded just mildly different. An example is the question on Medicare where it talks about the split from what the insured pays 20% and what Medicare pays 80%. Though this is a easy question to answer, all one has to do is read it and get the 2 backwards simply because it was read in a way that if you dont double check you can easily get it wrong not by ignorance only by mistake instead and that is not a genuine way to miss a question especially when the test is so dang long that your mind goes number after so many questions being answered.

You need to make this way more interactive and reduce the page length of each chapter. It's a slog to get through just reading one huge text page after another. Look at adjusterpro for how to do online education content right: it's broken down, interactive, and engaging.

Correct answer to missed exams questions with rationale should have been given to any question answered incorrectly

I thought the course layout was very user friendly. However, I found that the "SC Practice Exams" really didn't correlate that closely to the final exam. I felt like the final exam was preparing me to become a tax attorney. I was amazed at all the tax related questions.

Simply love the presentation of the course. I would suggest providing more opportunities to go back to a past lesson if the test score was low.

Very boring. Practice quizzes were not anything like final exam.

The PDF files and the lesson are not enough to study to prepare for the state board exam...i still do not feel prepared. What will help in taking the final exams is providing explanations on test questions the student got wrong even for the final exam.

The practice quizzes within the course are not effective due to the quality of question vs answer.

Some of the material was not proofread very well. Some of the sample chapter test questions were repeated for a reason unknown to me. I feel that the sample tests would have been more valuable if they did not repeat questions. Thank you, however, for an overall pleasant experience. Best wishes!

Make the practice test more like the exam

There were plenty of questions on the final exam that were not covered on the class material... luckily I have worked with insurance for a while so I knew the answers but someone new to the industry would not

What I liked most was 1) the blue "example" sections that provided more clarity to the concepts that were somewhat confusing and 2) the short videos at the end of most chapters that provided more clarity on the key concepts.

I like this course very much

The course is just very auditory learning and is very difficult for visual learners. also what you all make as important in the lesson is not what you all test on.

Have to figure out something more to do to hit the 40 hours besides the basic content. Any time spent amassing 40 hours as long as basic course is completed should count.

This is the second course I utilized from WebCe and is FAR SUPERIOR to that of a leading competitor. Thank You WebCe