I learned a lot on this one most definitely!!! Well done again!!!

Thank you for the course. Very clear

The recorded voice sounded mechanical and at times a monotonous drone. Could be better.

This course required way too much time to complete for earning only 1.5 hours CE. Otherwise, it’s a good course.

The questions just seem to try and trick the reader vs test the reader of knowledge in my oppinion.

Excellent Course.

time-effective way to complete CE

Excellent course for the FPQP designation.

The course content was very comprehensive and relatable to the subject that was being discussed. I liked the blend of background information about seniors coupled with the regulatory requirements to help protect seniors.

There were typos and poorly worded questions.

Some of the material was duplicated, but overall a very good, and relevant, course! Thank you!

Sufficient content.

I am not crazy about the trick questions.

Content was very appropriate and was presented well. Overall, it was well written.

Some words or phrases were inaudible in the read-it-to-me audio.

The coursework is too long and repetitive.

The time is too long for the credit hours. Many courses use 50 minutes for 1 hour of credit. You use around1.25 hours per 1 hour. Maybe these courses require more???

weak content. not useful in practice-6th grade level.

The read to me is valuable to help one focus on important points.

some sample test questions have ambiguous answers

The intermediate questions were very poorly written and in one case, did not have answers for 2 of the potential answers.

The content was clear and concise, the format was not redundant. Thank you.

Errata: Chapter 4 Practice Question #1 does not show the details of choices B and C.

Teachings are SO LONG...

I think the website is easy to use and the content of the course was great. I really liked the training, and I would recommend it to others.

The wording of some questions is unnecessary. Stop using double negative and make the statement simple and clear. The objective is to learn not to get confuse or play word games.

The course material repeated itself frequently from one subsection to another

The test question response regarding "Is financial exploitation a secret crime? or is NOT a secret crime? The two choices do not differentiate whether the 'secret crime' is from the point of the perpetrator or from the point of the community, regulators, financial service industry etc. (Either response is correct based on point of view. Please reword the question or responses!

There should be an optional dark mode you can enable on the website to decrease eye-strain.

Please continue to add more course. This is the third year of my taking the new IAR required courses and I've taken practically every one that is being offered. I prefer WebCE over other CE institutions. Thank you

This course just did not seem well organized relative to your other courses.

More clarity about which course require a proctor or not! I have spend a total of 8 hours on CE for the new FINRA requirement only to find out that a Proctor is required to obtain credit! Due to EOY events, appointments, and getting ready for the holidays I have spent waaaay to much time "re-doing" courses that do not require a Proctor to satisfy this new industry deadline. Although these courses will benefit me and will be something I can complete in the New Year, it was very confusing and frustrating.

Much of the content was wordy and technical when the concepts under discussion were fundamentally a matter of clear ethical thinking.

I believe I could have taken this exam without reading any of it.

Seemed like there was a lot of repetition of information.

It was very long. Hard to maintain necessary concentration.

This course felt very repetitive. I feel like we could have covered the same amount of content using half as many words.

I got all 15 questions correct and only scored a 93! Man, you guys grade tough!